{"id":"W1836838334","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00842.x","title":"Public Spending, Public Deficits and Government Coalitions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Status quo; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Status quo bias; Government (linguistics); Economics; Government spending; Public economics; Coalition government; Power (physics); Public spending; Political science; Politics; Market economy; Law; Welfare","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003351399,0.0001506229,0.0003493633,0.00007043082,0.0002669861,0.0001369618,0.0001389682,0.00008232428,0.000201504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001143103,0.0001561827,0.00007182343,0.00007856388,0.0003728748,0.0002515048,0.0002038685,0.0002205544,0.0005407006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000126468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000781983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007442798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985089,0.000009123584,0.0004154599,0.0003388117,0.00003948012,0.0006882328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991992,0.0001816252,0.00008872145,0.0002045489,0.00001834964,0.0003075818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.299513e-7,0.00004626764,0.1257632,0.00001673153,0.00006001697,8.197304e-7,0.00006134345,1.197466e-8,0.000003981589,0.872916,0.00101869,0.0001120478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002623239,0.00003397276,0.1134735,0.000003241392,0.000005893678,0.00001043667,0.0002874265,0.00007120229,0.00002913858,0.8144983,0.07110865,0.000215889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5114679,0.001021735,0.00008777827,0.03513673,0.0006256673,0.0001265964,0.0003800991,0.00006004633,0.4510934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976938,0.00005969792,0.0001896027,0.001271196,0.0003358817,0.00003409489,0.00000379049,0.00001532406,0.0003965639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4862259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6949793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1626504726451763,"score_gpt":0.2765816914786549,"score_spread":0.1139312188334786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}