{"id":"W1837318343","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4667","title":"ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT IDEATION PRACTICES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideation; Presentation (obstetrics); Engineering design process; Management science; Computer science; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Engineering; Medicine; Mechanical engineering; Cognitive science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1955774,0.001949755,0.004345193,0.01279517,0.001758556,0.007302729,0.006612755,0.007463168,0.01740739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.601073,0.001570228,0.008151802,0.01039204,0.01359922,0.008098988,0.007203722,0.007032244,0.001901051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004420275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002041662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002815263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6951607,0.1775571,0.05672293,0.01579504,0.05213949,0.002624734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1057965,0.8187461,0.04301035,0.01659117,0.01368356,0.002172314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03242963,0.003093767,0.05298989,0.2301307,0.06179358,0.000461446,0.005069221,0.001658093,0.001288185,0.02096296,0.003763974,0.5863587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02989112,0.05493469,0.2775427,0.3390487,0.1008247,0.003115412,0.01144391,0.002900673,0.008905463,0.06387364,0.106702,0.0008171652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1386987,0.7696854,0.0137077,0.02301713,0.002961586,0.003581613,0.002593094,0.0001249241,0.04562989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7624326,0.200533,0.02250561,0.00656359,0.00181002,0.002841423,0.001863843,0.0001429671,0.001306892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1955774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05070226948060015,"score_gpt":0.3337184129992564,"score_spread":0.2830161435186563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}