{"id":"W1837515634","doi":"10.1002/jgra.50598","title":"A reexamination of latitudinal limits of substorm‐produced energetic electron precipitation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics","topic":"Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marsden Fund; U.S. Geological Survey; Natural Environment Research Council; Alberta Agricultural Research Institute; National Institute of Polar Research; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Sight Research UK; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Substorm; Precipitation; Earth's magnetic field; Electron precipitation; Atmospheric sciences; Latitude; Range (aeronautics); Geophysics; Physics; Geology; Magnetosphere; Magnetic field; Meteorology; Astronomy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005110825,0.0001014876,0.0001028513,0.0005482417,0.0002087734,0.0003024392,0.0001785566,0.0001069755,0.0006586183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000842188,0.00007360601,0.0001036555,0.0002942426,0.0001954927,0.0002568458,0.0002750582,0.0002065317,0.0001416017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001896435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008519916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005403962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008156198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999051,0.00002345881,0.00001044582,0.0000230793,0.00002024054,0.00001753179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988406,0.0002933281,0.0003821334,0.0001197206,0.0002878893,0.00007628518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008983292,0.00001217593,0.9759731,0.00001889471,0.00002226834,0.0001127365,0.0002378744,0.0004425073,0.01575351,0.00009754909,0.000121415,0.007117996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001677865,0.00002730785,0.9969091,0.000004073053,0.000005527615,0.00005734925,0.0001275521,0.0005849107,0.001803267,0.00002939354,0.0004481782,0.000001853217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975745,0.0001246926,0.0006555814,0.00002729829,0.000001780627,0.000002866739,0.0001756366,0.00001683406,0.001420733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993376,0.0000320523,0.0002881575,0.00001554057,0.000003070719,0.000002273702,0.0001987026,0.000003018958,0.0001194639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005403962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01074505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02442260177610776,"score_gpt":0.313298816696734,"score_spread":0.2888762149206263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}