{"id":"W1837756906","doi":"","title":"Empirical Studies on Collaboration in Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Software development; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Empirical research; Software technical review; Software peer review; Software engineering; Software development process; Software; Engineering management; Engineering; Management science; Data science; Software construction; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000600965,0.0001136826,0.0002498519,0.0001112925,0.00004103392,0.0001184313,0.0002897217,0.00004506107,0.000001336527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001110589,0.00008004889,0.00002051236,0.00099523,0.000003539404,0.0004456864,0.00003657721,0.0001198154,0.00001618123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000690442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004313886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.097107e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002156925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990888,0.00008531349,0.0003126458,0.0002052768,0.0001950337,0.0001128962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991943,0.0002943966,0.0000811596,0.0002926147,0.0001080446,0.000029437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000512218,0.001320012,0.002180442,0.4490799,0.0003144066,0.001334515,0.04977058,0.001970781,0.00004502516,0.1326224,0.2249421,0.1363686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008952356,0.001521327,0.005661932,0.9332282,0.00006938066,0.0002880483,0.0002123776,0.006600593,0.002272514,0.01155103,0.03546808,0.002231284],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001405095,0.3458619,0.6346014,0.01264567,0.0004581395,0.001918894,7.920034e-7,0.002586556,0.0005215881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04626638,0.01886545,0.9220015,0.01214988,0.00004401113,0.000215276,0.000005265713,0.0000116379,0.0004405998],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4841483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3264299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03621662441729649,"score_gpt":0.3607259492049986,"score_spread":0.3245093247877021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}