{"id":"W183851629","doi":"10.1023/a:1014991300192","title":"Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Ambiguity; Focus (optics); Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02702817,0.0007406584,0.001384501,0.003327157,0.005752307,0.01011652,0.002270234,0.009193472,0.005139128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1076425,0.0009372378,0.0007700344,0.001826599,0.04325654,0.03392834,0.007963057,0.01106094,0.0007342597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003735236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003171112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001372804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001182759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597573,0.03152429,0.00124788,0.002456602,0.004337163,0.0006767918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8786847,0.1044795,0.003938669,0.008187094,0.003883792,0.0008261569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001871231,0.00001157745,0.0002442967,0.00003475815,0.000006649766,0.00005024998,0.002642065,0.0001736668,0.00006620205,0.9912722,0.00084624,0.004633403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086715,0.000003591499,0.00005046912,0.00002942417,0.000003580409,0.0000617546,0.0004444727,0.0008339031,0.00007979234,0.996545,0.001932187,0.000004975776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1026878,0.005112146,0.5413538,0.1478307,0.001093136,0.0001064179,0.0001380248,0.0003418595,0.2013361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485129,0.0006037453,0.04363539,0.002551483,0.0003550338,0.0001276008,0.00004528872,0.0001128204,0.004055761],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02702817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1429403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04150312515925259,"score_gpt":0.3190587741036113,"score_spread":0.2775556489443587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}