{"id":"W1841082934","doi":"10.1111/auar.12039","title":"Assessing Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Using Expert Accounting Witness Evidence and the <i>Conceptual Framework</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Accounting Review","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Accounting research; Forensic accounting; Conceptual framework; Financial accounting; Objectivity (philosophy); Impartiality; Accounting standard; Witness; Positive accounting; Conformity; Business; Accounting information system; Political science; Audit; Sociology; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3602309,0.0006635807,0.001084453,0.02498653,0.004568013,0.0209995,0.00578023,0.005690338,0.002528701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5933291,0.0007443012,0.002116348,0.01314282,0.01960275,0.02315022,0.01163245,0.00604539,0.0005100947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008907278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01737085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01273272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02582903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6259291,0.2271678,0.05675569,0.0114646,0.07183625,0.006846548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2802024,0.4633791,0.1305414,0.04252039,0.07927557,0.004081146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000220313,0.0004317722,0.3620729,0.001887784,0.0004725323,0.001317375,0.05134202,0.003656419,0.001090122,0.4173543,0.008671399,0.151483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001560946,0.001751968,0.3077779,0.01203898,0.0006462295,0.002835333,0.1292638,0.02223268,0.006503508,0.4459393,0.07012788,0.0007263312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6327783,0.006669571,0.1869512,0.04296272,0.001046594,0.0033544,0.0009487144,0.0001872489,0.1251012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270338,0.0009707871,0.06644624,0.003498602,0.0001211899,0.0007207565,0.0002914531,0.0000204185,0.0008967415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3602309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7889493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05928964212422695,"score_gpt":0.3024996865015677,"score_spread":0.2432100443773407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}