{"id":"W184251112","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2006.032","title":"Selecting a Pesticide Fate Model at the Watershed Scale Using a Multi-criteria Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Selection (genetic algorithm); Strengths and weaknesses; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Process (computing); Model selection; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Operations research; Geography; Machine learning; Engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00855867,0.0001850287,0.000292033,0.0002059028,0.002890091,0.0002417904,0.0004794176,0.00007270918,0.00126054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006556744,0.00009928759,0.0003004277,0.0005403542,0.0007392175,0.0003066849,0.001132133,0.0006255434,0.000315516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004669703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009647896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003438229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00263341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955196,0.001501883,0.0005149154,0.0004070053,0.0008959955,0.001160593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992987,0.0001052641,0.00008584576,0.0003195765,0.0000613046,0.000129333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001721509,0.0001429672,0.4801161,0.00001711661,0.0005959207,0.00004925002,0.005399858,0.4202086,0.09127018,0.0000105179,0.001821765,0.0001955232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001759756,0.0001158833,0.1655003,0.00002290867,0.0008338903,0.0001248557,0.001287582,0.7885287,0.03104817,0.007970846,0.002074753,0.0007323691],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807037,0.00003481938,0.01515918,0.003074934,0.00004260677,0.0001860578,0.000004026581,0.00002475255,0.0007699393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904997,0.00001334428,0.002813234,0.0001505662,0.00009776171,0.00000867107,0.0000105809,0.00001515842,0.006390951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3683201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1405938796283361,"score_gpt":0.4069818975105704,"score_spread":0.2663880178822343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}