{"id":"W184251112","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2006.032","title":"Selecting a Pesticide Fate Model at the Watershed Scale Using a Multi-criteria Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Selection (genetic algorithm); Strengths and weaknesses; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Process (computing); Model selection; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Operations research; Geography; Machine learning; Engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004456748,0.001173925,0.001121532,0.003724558,0.0008508591,0.002525493,0.001394228,0.001551081,0.001996871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006245626,0.0004967265,0.002085705,0.001445354,0.0006574105,0.0009794226,0.001263646,0.0006314101,0.0001453921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002625893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002552775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008102785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982432,0.001062218,0.00009523357,0.0001061738,0.0003281561,0.000165049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954389,0.003446375,0.0002567411,0.00009290755,0.0005904777,0.0001746316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005093014,0.0000715791,0.003482138,0.00005906174,0.00006414167,0.0001021161,0.00004705544,0.9885079,0.0008836432,0.001814816,0.0001338013,0.004782799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001147104,0.00005212409,0.0004122044,0.000009603693,0.00002053124,0.000009579937,0.00004752457,0.9981402,0.000313316,0.0008619272,0.0001145894,0.000006886555],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5292156,0.0001939743,0.4604944,0.0007151936,0.00002132298,0.0007226021,0.0004799287,0.0002670394,0.007889899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8984675,0.00008396612,0.09983838,0.00003664554,0.000007464303,0.0004387303,0.0002031995,0.00002579524,0.0008983127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01331553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02647603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1405938796283361,"score_gpt":0.4069818975105704,"score_spread":0.2663880178822343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}