{"id":"W1842656685","doi":"10.1002/asi.23430","title":"A learning to rank approach for quality‐aware pseudo‐relevance feedback","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relevance feedback; Computer science; Relevance (law); Information retrieval; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Rank (graph theory); Learning to rank; Artificial intelligence; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006343624,0.00006985557,0.0001575678,0.0006194645,0.0004262435,0.0003404751,0.001016852,0.00009418674,2.122308e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008473849,0.00004772947,0.0000591108,0.001986986,0.00007690085,0.004171542,0.0001954545,0.0001860072,0.000005522298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003687133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005011348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001447933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.713419e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981661,0.00002662316,0.0005482775,0.00007942223,0.0009298236,0.0002497485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937283,0.0001376633,0.0009572788,0.0001585617,0.004914665,0.0001034627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002981109,0.0001481577,0.0207658,0.0001653288,0.00007880775,2.25695e-7,0.03052773,0.006810204,0.003023498,0.4928189,0.02155472,0.4238085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01001618,0.003061862,0.01509986,0.00009669583,0.00006343224,0.0001718078,0.02255622,0.2717701,0.02698754,0.02545842,0.6238227,0.0008951618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1281946,0.00001566387,0.8470783,0.02150604,0.0008105147,0.001003123,0.00001169613,0.00008960792,0.001290405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510456,0.000008255399,0.04762748,0.000821255,0.0000427947,0.00003851971,0.000001686657,0.000002757161,0.0004116947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8228509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03254206003375365,"score_gpt":0.3121337353469585,"score_spread":0.2795916753132049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}