{"id":"W1842986359","doi":"10.1029/2007gb003024","title":"Comparison of regional carbon flux estimates from CO<sub>2</sub> concentration measurements and remote sensing based footprint integration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eddy covariance; Environmental science; Flux (metallurgy); Atmospheric sciences; Carbon cycle; Diurnal cycle; Carbon sink; Primary production; Planetary boundary layer; Climatology; Boundary layer; Ecosystem; Climate change; Geology; Physics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211599,0.0005531309,0.0004382122,0.001645681,0.0001392028,0.0008038101,0.0005751185,0.0004983844,0.0007836064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002402365,0.0003888106,0.000533358,0.001389965,0.0001583326,0.0008668739,0.0004138888,0.0001964563,0.0003484492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006070044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002590928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01512732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02566767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995981,0.0001013969,0.00002812864,0.0001128008,0.0001198937,0.00003970593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990017,0.0002568621,0.0001359732,0.0001075692,0.0004780188,0.00001985675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001549424,0.0002015028,0.4977168,0.0004063964,0.00120381,0.0003144042,0.000753527,0.1526306,0.08300857,0.001105379,0.002312299,0.2587974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001335048,0.0001483912,0.7853653,0.00006152245,0.0003917169,0.0001974828,0.000318695,0.1811116,0.02854406,0.0004133111,0.003198797,0.0001155887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775652,0.0004406174,0.01562621,0.00005140913,0.0000115879,0.00003047191,0.001111523,0.0004108424,0.004752142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675205,0.0002270996,0.02883615,0.00006476276,0.00001498484,0.00006606982,0.002487819,0.0001182713,0.0006643822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01512732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03007859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02531084148121053,"score_gpt":0.2503774009253165,"score_spread":0.2250665594441059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}