{"id":"W1844540554","doi":"10.1109/iclp.2010.7845943","title":"Electric field within lightning protection volume in presence of a downward leader: Simulation results","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lightning (connector); Electric field; RADIUS; Volume (thermodynamics); Ionization; Mechanics; Finite volume method; Finite element method; Physics; Electrical engineering; Geometry; Meteorology; Ion; Structural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002741819,0.0004085226,0.0007375017,0.0005995493,0.0004952684,0.0007737741,0.0007123157,0.001784622,0.002720264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001116007,0.0002183453,0.0006557885,0.0006413176,0.0006242361,0.0004367522,0.0004071566,0.0005983057,0.000269055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000553359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005305543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004408163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998683,0.00002907424,0.000005626621,0.00001667967,0.00003635486,0.00004405064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.0005833271,0.00006853261,0.00004250354,0.0001366978,0.00007576729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009447264,0.0000436931,0.002199082,0.00004431236,0.00001357004,0.0002935575,0.00007408351,0.9929992,0.001878688,0.0005023432,0.000269729,0.001587286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002910668,0.00008628714,0.0008308923,0.00001403847,0.00001428977,0.00006711364,0.0001077067,0.996283,0.001785646,0.0003280275,0.0004410284,0.00001282552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584952,0.0002471999,0.0224684,0.0002299264,0.00005146508,0.00005738842,0.0007104213,0.0003944604,0.01734564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958727,0.00008768585,0.00200771,0.00002128142,0.000006232257,0.00002717184,0.0001720707,0.00002793679,0.001777328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01026249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02040553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009239144255909368,"score_gpt":0.231156589816877,"score_spread":0.2219174455609677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}