{"id":"W1846904066","doi":"10.24908/fg.v7i1.4386","title":"OUTLOOKS FOR THE LEGAL FRAMING OF PARADIPLOMACY: THE CASE OF BRAZIL","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Governance","topic":"International Relations and Autism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Phenomenon; Federal state; State (computer science); Public administration; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01123396,0.0003303073,0.0005567179,0.001588874,0.008147257,0.008656147,0.001490372,0.005840628,0.004106131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01193069,0.0002636497,0.001020908,0.00146096,0.0235769,0.008519073,0.004360026,0.005252656,0.0002568134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01385441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00959524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08870318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07840092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941683,0.003487307,0.0001260804,0.0003610982,0.0006113591,0.001245786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960453,0.002157467,0.0004575882,0.0003211574,0.000679826,0.0003386715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002752418,0.000006029127,0.0002061057,0.00001126182,0.000001434026,0.0001572666,0.005163501,0.00009883864,0.00005638325,0.9928079,0.0005932669,0.0008953434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003074691,0.00002663998,0.002234872,0.0006512917,0.00002508982,0.0003700456,0.03453108,0.001306464,0.0002814002,0.8167819,0.1437102,0.00005023694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1431765,0.01702887,0.01046932,0.3220568,0.0004876903,0.0001002594,0.0001262494,0.00004364721,0.5065107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864745,0.002239212,0.001471244,0.004764527,0.0001314483,0.00004773099,0.00002816787,0.0000124896,0.004830789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08870318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1763738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01266132348675672,"score_gpt":0.3254216824690669,"score_spread":0.3127603589823102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}