{"id":"W1849782715","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v2i2.112","title":"PRF - SYNTHESIS - The right to food: Reflecting on the past and future possibilities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to food; Food security; Civil society; Political science; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Food systems; Politics; Social movement; Agriculture; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Geography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001454327,0.000199363,0.0002095913,0.0001492017,0.002370007,0.0002320864,0.000265917,0.00006621364,0.00003656664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004786993,0.0001230689,0.00004370805,0.0003684328,0.0004284341,0.0001547133,0.0000387697,0.0001268853,0.000008998369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001959185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005027045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1195524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982359,0.0003846435,0.0002417125,0.0003268256,0.000185228,0.0006256428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998044,0.0006949328,0.00008658072,0.0002239958,0.0003094186,0.0006411154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000220789,0.00001520827,0.001765584,0.00004200408,0.0004462623,0.00002183503,0.586484,0.00001391072,0.000008273822,0.3971308,0.007745968,0.006304122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000184396,0.0004263413,0.008511663,0.0001387616,0.00008237267,0.000009150982,0.5142784,0.000002301401,0.00009751223,0.009464674,0.4664327,0.0003717666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.949136,0.0007932523,8.524805e-7,0.03264907,0.0004469836,0.0006097979,0.00004537087,0.00002996659,0.01628873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963314,0.0001154178,0.00009586786,0.001618334,0.000540782,0.0002020419,0.000004143272,0.00001921518,0.001072809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1199377276085187,"score_gpt":0.3128301564972326,"score_spread":0.1928924288887139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}