{"id":"W1851020454","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3928","title":"EXPERIENCE AND REFLECTION ON THE USE OF RUBRICS FOR SENIOR CAPSTIONE DESIGN COURSE ASSESSMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Engineering Education and Pedagogy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Rubric; Course (navigation); Capstone; Peer assessment; Reflection (computer programming); Capstone course; Standards-based assessment; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Formative assessment; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07099082,0.002409634,0.001031201,0.003766553,0.002683964,0.005130786,0.004412706,0.004153582,0.002315897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2475598,0.001053414,0.001199831,0.00322866,0.004466296,0.005055024,0.005734978,0.005198573,0.001387895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002344116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001878737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001823626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8758405,0.0948351,0.004705222,0.004518799,0.017127,0.002973313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7303396,0.1936371,0.0108777,0.01902638,0.04158479,0.004534361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004557884,0.002893835,0.01571153,0.001217665,0.0001949273,0.002924321,0.4231606,0.003131316,0.04275854,0.003135664,0.009066693,0.4953491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003083228,0.01216361,0.06469394,0.0038385,0.0005884355,0.02527452,0.2983014,0.03820227,0.1335545,0.008109337,0.4130346,0.001930631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7706327,0.003015076,0.1909066,0.004093197,0.0005754003,0.001030971,0.000105671,0.00133659,0.02830386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849345,0.002662602,0.1300026,0.002156726,0.0004016339,0.0004967358,0.0002094275,0.001193009,0.01353228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07099082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3754398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08628068640757675,"score_gpt":0.2803403034989765,"score_spread":0.1940596170913998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}