{"id":"W1852492902","doi":"10.1002/asi.23229","title":"Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politeness; Psychology; Politeness theory; Peer review; Criticism; Inclusion (mineral); Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06209039,0.000558332,0.0006127768,0.003249764,0.00429852,0.01163594,0.001283996,0.00216442,0.001476525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3483202,0.0006126127,0.0004378997,0.001487483,0.007143374,0.005598702,0.007480818,0.002511019,0.0005921512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002294479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00423835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008691898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00129547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.748116,0.211976,0.01043669,0.005015291,0.02211803,0.002338115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4844926,0.3805674,0.07791388,0.02300302,0.02798693,0.006036212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006490404,0.0002731403,0.05951988,0.001667407,0.0002082803,0.001917481,0.6048506,0.000859304,0.021032,0.027287,0.003196894,0.278539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004145689,0.00214666,0.1823591,0.004454579,0.0005254862,0.009471778,0.3900825,0.01947179,0.02647089,0.1052809,0.2579389,0.001382855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8626916,0.003328558,0.07841289,0.004499433,0.0004801464,0.0005829112,0.00004699354,0.0003941199,0.04956328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987698,0.0004017878,0.009686042,0.0004009006,0.0001029842,0.0001809244,0.00001958922,0.00005358939,0.001456079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.988364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3283693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04214944938916158,"score_gpt":0.3247842915104784,"score_spread":0.2826348421213168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}