{"id":"W1852492902","doi":"10.1002/asi.23229","title":"Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politeness; Psychology; Politeness theory; Peer review; Criticism; Inclusion (mineral); Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00345149,0.00003735229,0.0001760746,0.0003517428,0.0001639831,0.0002744265,0.0004267708,0.00002369547,0.000007932803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005291138,0.00002210703,0.00003300627,0.0003387347,0.0002473025,0.00372131,0.0001095692,0.00006057982,7.899777e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006641948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001129028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003089432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001052701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990192,0.000019639,0.0004007632,0.00003070609,0.0004441919,0.000085504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957785,0.00008990977,0.001011644,0.00008803474,0.003023192,0.000008736989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004407966,0.00001382417,0.001725636,0.00005518105,0.0000268826,2.213467e-8,0.004344248,0.00001461678,0.00004238921,0.9785546,0.005167929,0.01005028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007661057,0.0001946946,0.005081632,0.0006175898,0.0001424719,0.000004577371,0.03542121,0.0003206659,0.0006464332,0.07727712,0.8793772,0.0001503324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5361022,0.001801102,0.0006497459,0.252158,0.00211041,0.002183479,0.0001020302,0.0000509358,0.204842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987427,0.0001295419,0.0001074938,0.000493735,0.00002022214,0.000004710925,7.105098e-7,0.000001034032,0.0004998332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04214944938916158,"score_gpt":0.3247842915104784,"score_spread":0.2826348421213168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}