{"id":"W1852547058","doi":"10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432","title":"L2 learners' interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: insights from their metalinguistic reflections","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Awareness","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corrective feedback; Metalinguistics; Psychology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Language proficiency; Inter-rater reliability; Cognitive psychology; Skepticism; Peer feedback; Second-language acquisition; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Vocabulary development","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001428612,0.0001154514,0.0001955241,0.0001157666,0.0002290352,0.0001039386,0.00007594268,0.00003997114,0.00008816377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000255536,0.00009294446,0.00003901993,0.00004841369,0.0001292363,0.0001322713,0.00003559473,0.0001829658,0.000007463479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007088485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004021776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006203158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005636187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992776,0.0001613417,0.0001601846,0.0001799662,0.0001141294,0.0001068125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.000220192,0.0001071976,0.0001287555,0.00008176297,0.00005562108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005719973,0.00003389189,0.0009189412,0.00002418048,0.0001054264,0.000008355982,0.9708149,0.000155312,0.0005093692,0.02552265,0.00008357343,0.00176619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005718278,0.0001369839,0.0003788288,0.0002371805,0.0001106004,0.000004169242,0.9804593,0.003318243,0.0007258972,0.0106834,0.003116598,0.0002570097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454416,0.001382786,0.007171798,0.00003794081,0.0007765949,0.00008091611,0.00002440072,0.0001161258,0.04496783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984323,0.000005154578,0.00009764293,0.0000542314,0.0003210093,0.00000509861,0.00005765408,0.00001874536,0.001008198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05299066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9377362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09263982218473858,"score_gpt":0.3080856129035561,"score_spread":0.2154457907188175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}