{"id":"W1852547058","doi":"10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432","title":"L2 learners' interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: insights from their metalinguistic reflections","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Awareness","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corrective feedback; Metalinguistics; Psychology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Language proficiency; Inter-rater reliability; Cognitive psychology; Skepticism; Peer feedback; Second-language acquisition; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Vocabulary development","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00398934,0.0007253239,0.0004405069,0.0009298358,0.001376283,0.004197218,0.0007664608,0.001301539,0.001703465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02144504,0.0003484589,0.0002631941,0.0004516717,0.00320884,0.00186176,0.001845915,0.00165204,0.0005434886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001223086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001133484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005360562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004211531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965274,0.002109827,0.0001398347,0.0002998134,0.000674967,0.000248137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890588,0.008065713,0.0009973759,0.000419172,0.001204733,0.0002542489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057297,0.0001092652,0.009921377,0.0001601529,0.000009636696,0.001319941,0.9528702,0.0002339255,0.01381097,0.0007588372,0.0002885294,0.0204114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004172519,0.0007481842,0.05454163,0.0004232168,0.00004654763,0.003520845,0.8936444,0.002197539,0.02137456,0.002997756,0.02029509,0.0001684109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910197,0.0001572365,0.002801812,0.0002476078,0.000008144237,0.00003267172,0.00002276542,0.00004490837,0.005665057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956619,0.000175392,0.00109148,0.00007880232,0.000004580725,0.00003364747,0.00002722201,0.0000459827,0.002880953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005360562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0210979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09263982218473858,"score_gpt":0.3080856129035561,"score_spread":0.2154457907188175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}