{"id":"W1853419240","doi":"","title":"A New Conception of Wilful Blindness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sansregret","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Blindness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005430852,0.000449456,0.0005875088,0.002572059,0.01476422,0.01308973,0.002465486,0.007048978,0.002809568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01087492,0.000382449,0.0005994467,0.001785794,0.04167398,0.005607435,0.004324128,0.008394052,0.0001489171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08605994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1110355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9363167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.959418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927545,0.001356438,0.0001469829,0.0006487434,0.003133823,0.001959489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686,0.001101946,0.0001439325,0.0002101094,0.001223456,0.000460633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008603437,0.000004364861,0.0003392836,0.00001027474,0.000003968706,0.0001392078,0.002924741,0.0003163643,0.00007102176,0.9895517,0.003332408,0.003298073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003502685,0.00002507126,0.003051136,0.0002359151,0.00003300204,0.0002150225,0.006992254,0.002143302,0.0004365828,0.8289816,0.1577194,0.0001315195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1199675,0.01057758,0.02018958,0.1787129,0.00116966,0.0001721272,0.0002920984,0.0001132607,0.6688053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602961,0.001394679,0.002699472,0.01077284,0.0001913342,0.00002919573,0.00002915036,0.00002548839,0.02456174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08605994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6244115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04023229177587528,"score_gpt":0.3332839430083114,"score_spread":0.2930516512324361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}