{"id":"W1853635131","doi":"10.1111/jphs.12029","title":"Societal monetary benefits of pharmaceutical innovation: the case of ramipril in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Institute of Health Economics","funders":"Pfizer Canada","keywords":"Ramipril; Medicine; Productivity; Population; Health care; Developing country; Economic growth; Economics; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00145443,0.0003673468,0.000592254,0.001783001,0.001484524,0.002226795,0.00124224,0.0009765276,0.003113157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006842381,0.0002405548,0.001065262,0.003219185,0.0007829656,0.0008161363,0.001312343,0.001870158,0.0001585202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04641014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02268406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988093,0.0001736062,0.00004167676,0.0001247175,0.0002181685,0.0006325986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965932,0.001186066,0.0004982295,0.0001120905,0.001035913,0.0005743875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009941738,0.000442129,0.6893305,0.0002913501,0.0006823213,0.002046044,0.00133998,0.2212119,0.0005846727,0.04022913,0.01146408,0.03138364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002013275,0.0001384904,0.4924475,0.0001441905,0.0003944259,0.0003946558,0.003777901,0.486314,0.0003977052,0.006843407,0.008809822,0.0001365977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851612,0.001497056,0.001037317,0.002736039,0.00001893803,0.00007761889,0.004491263,0.00002113178,0.004959494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954442,0.0005741303,0.0005381699,0.00011373,0.00000873077,0.00001745019,0.001418583,0.000005630212,0.001879323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04641014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3367307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1717247181537969,"score_gpt":0.4354661040851271,"score_spread":0.2637413859313302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}