{"id":"W1853883674","doi":"10.1890/14-2483","title":"Conservation vs. livelihoods: spatial management of non‐timber forest product harvests in a two‐dimensional model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Livelihood; Ecosystem services; Forest product; Poverty; Biodiversity; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem; China; Product (mathematics); Welfare; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Ecology; Agroforestry; Economics; Agriculture; Environmental science; Economic growth; Biology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002406759,0.0001147208,0.0001310648,0.00004541162,0.0001225439,0.000009662994,0.0002400585,0.00003731791,0.0007847844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001266152,0.0000806492,0.00004714955,0.0002524817,0.0002182142,0.00009241143,0.0004026792,0.0000453636,0.0003397309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001440249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001000345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003129224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001350211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998871,0.00003280147,0.0002735388,0.0003920647,0.000233081,0.0001975489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994801,0.0000597038,0.0001130811,0.0002644442,0.00002169349,0.00006095241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000365505,0.0006849191,0.9648618,0.00001837391,0.00001747572,0.000002906336,0.00005956317,0.02363015,0.001035263,0.0007588899,0.001558835,0.007335321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000623374,0.00003311511,0.9739236,0.00001432734,0.00001899587,5.624163e-7,0.00001593997,0.01840778,0.0001034232,0.002557309,0.004180504,0.0001211096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968484,0.000004154,0.02037783,0.004404783,0.0000210712,0.001138756,0.00001780623,0.00003254113,0.005519098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887328,0.00001544461,0.008372114,0.0004147548,0.00001726324,0.0003537413,0.00001823047,0.000004908095,0.002070812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02024877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8592839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01389057896870386,"score_gpt":0.2302798198627518,"score_spread":0.216389240894048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}