{"id":"W1854952045","doi":"10.1002/wrcr.20447","title":"Assessing the extent of altruism in the valuation of community drinking water quality improvements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Valuation (finance); Water quality; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Contingent valuation; Quality (philosophy); Environmental economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Environmental planning; Microeconomics; Willingness to pay; Social psychology; Psychology; Ecology; Finance; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01386774,0.00007356649,0.0001884277,0.0001505978,0.0002642897,0.000118753,0.000524936,0.00005199263,0.0004380181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006460046,0.00003902676,0.00005759134,0.00008209335,0.0002196759,0.0002927468,0.0002755009,0.0003709249,0.0001997846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003245166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01184611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007687267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979085,0.0008099863,0.0006854659,0.0001373461,0.0001615239,0.0002971661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990926,0.0002154694,0.0001372977,0.0005011472,0.00003404875,0.00001942032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133843,0.000409573,0.8422875,0.000114777,0.00005245854,1.885605e-7,0.1155647,0.0006910146,0.03000872,0.002761111,0.00008148974,0.008015013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003161466,0.00005896056,0.9337866,0.00001323208,0.000001697999,2.73116e-7,0.008683627,0.001098375,0.01441273,0.04086793,0.000695539,0.0000648817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940589,0.00007744551,0.00007982182,0.001083214,0.00003384942,0.0004656634,0.000003147928,0.000002509438,0.004195452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995171,0.00002040427,0.00003486517,0.00008535953,0.00002299876,0.00008588904,0.00002129206,0.000009088404,0.0002029304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1068811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4060810466663864,"score_gpt":0.377297613789935,"score_spread":0.02878343287645141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}