{"id":"W1857397206","doi":"10.1139/t11-091","title":"Calibration of constitutive parameters by inverse analysis for a geotechnical boundary problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Soil and Unsaturated Flow","field":"Engineering","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Constitutive equation; Geotechnical engineering; Finite element method; Geotechnics; Calibration; Population; Boundary (topology); Boundary value problem; Geology; Reliability (semiconductor); Structural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002142216,0.0004961743,0.0005644258,0.0008230935,0.0004908817,0.0008708187,0.0007418894,0.001147917,0.001086037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006593063,0.0003911814,0.0005266537,0.00060977,0.001114163,0.001078287,0.0007647029,0.001237848,0.0004369987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005740047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002418303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002141487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991583,0.0002339206,0.00004052938,0.0001776577,0.0003392312,0.00005039198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984642,0.0008682474,0.0001828922,0.0002091154,0.0002553303,0.000020214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004181492,0.0001233394,0.003355272,0.0000981226,0.00001477748,0.000123051,0.0003378839,0.8340267,0.04341333,0.02168081,0.0004356122,0.09634926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005064308,0.0000232175,0.0007107957,0.00001101497,0.000005005326,0.00005529135,0.000034199,0.9864491,0.007884908,0.003922459,0.0008864956,0.00001238932],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02416197,0.0000211036,0.974807,0.00003044334,0.000004296871,0.00002918856,0.00001387592,0.0001404367,0.0007917841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4098631,0.00008977304,0.5889999,0.00003416042,0.000006386667,0.0001597322,0.00009898475,0.0001134718,0.0006343784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002418303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01132929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01316595453878729,"score_gpt":0.2117207930468458,"score_spread":0.1985548385080585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}