{"id":"W1862085023","doi":"10.1109/cmpass.1996.507877","title":"Feasibility of model checking software requirements: a case study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Model checking; Computer science; Executable; Property (philosophy); Formal specification; Counterexample; Software requirements specification; Programming language; System requirements specification; State space; Formal verification; State (computer science); Specification language; Software; Symbolic trajectory evaluation; Software engineering; Software design; Software development; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01744705,0.0008690705,0.000617763,0.001428538,0.002238724,0.00169168,0.002251658,0.004347746,0.002952971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07737719,0.0009645803,0.001591138,0.001252699,0.003120824,0.004025245,0.002486016,0.002708809,0.0003661018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002328454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002732845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006623473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008763811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9782001,0.01457787,0.0007308643,0.0009549045,0.004609413,0.000926856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.842523,0.141503,0.002717878,0.008085774,0.004468754,0.0007015465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00399928,0.003596955,0.05336324,0.002336045,0.0003618757,0.04316806,0.02388622,0.3188827,0.04543949,0.2473796,0.01116373,0.2464228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199198,0.002824455,0.006941009,0.0005906441,0.000308952,0.01176963,0.008286372,0.7799672,0.0771239,0.07525325,0.0355139,0.000221461],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7893879,0.0005241941,0.1842737,0.005309605,0.00007666311,0.0006316496,0.000297423,0.001040969,0.01845778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916434,0.000190696,0.08156408,0.000156279,0.00001835943,0.0002167508,0.0001546869,0.0001060963,0.001159131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01744705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09226996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3030465777782742,"score_gpt":0.3991558754877993,"score_spread":0.0961092977095252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}