{"id":"W1862165567","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2015-0371","title":"A microscopic derivation of nuclear collective rotation–vibration model, axially symmetric case","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Nuclear physics research studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Axial symmetry; Classical mechanics; Schrödinger equation; Harmonic oscillator; Wave function; Invariant (physics); Rotation (mathematics); Bohr model; Equations of motion; Vibration; Mathematical physics; Quantum mechanics; Quantum electrodynamics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003129161,0.0004638939,0.0005260534,0.0005217932,0.0006537121,0.0004657504,0.001403683,0.0007388107,0.003632172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004793653,0.0002289679,0.0005429292,0.0003601405,0.0009277088,0.0009165669,0.0008587709,0.0007166854,0.0008172811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006736218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009853073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003024661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002509734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998784,0.00002477134,0.000006212848,0.00001973791,0.00005876277,0.00001208232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999874,0.00001988637,0.00001916587,0.00002819784,0.00004168031,0.00001696254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005750918,0.00001815679,0.0001891111,0.00006094991,0.00001044143,0.0002351426,0.0001048601,0.05927264,0.006858263,0.9286737,0.001067299,0.003503641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001322436,0.0000466917,0.0005371277,0.00002240547,0.000009879153,0.0002823561,0.00005870874,0.6093425,0.001495969,0.3821146,0.006038522,0.00003812309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05504863,0.0008404522,0.8841481,0.0009464437,0.0002859767,0.00008535591,0.0003842685,0.000154153,0.05810668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8215347,0.001558313,0.1477773,0.0006296368,0.0003120959,0.000380147,0.0003429279,0.0001835363,0.02728136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003632172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01215076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03701352514051941,"score_gpt":0.2731881957741764,"score_spread":0.2361746706336569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}