{"id":"W1864504472","doi":"10.1029/2004gl019502","title":"Sensitivity of Asian dust storm to natural and anthropogenic factors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Atmospheric aerosols and clouds","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Desertification; Precipitation; Storm; Dust storm; Environmental science; Natural (archaeology); China; Vegetation (pathology); Chine; Physical geography; Spring (device); Asian Dust; Climatology; Atmospheric sciences; Geology; Geography; Meteorology; Aerosol; Oceanography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004047802,0.0002056883,0.0002329658,0.0002798068,0.0002551436,0.0007424385,0.0001840871,0.0001866691,0.0007620059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008153066,0.0001131746,0.0002926856,0.0004841111,0.0002281194,0.0003015199,0.0003943261,0.0001845604,0.0001465707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000531165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003600488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02460727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01743052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999813,0.00004529518,0.00001774956,0.0000395696,0.00002820952,0.00005611673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991708,0.0002068319,0.0002114595,0.00008711572,0.0002188788,0.0001049143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003686871,0.00003677441,0.9794836,0.00003390063,0.0001811238,0.0003420233,0.0002807299,0.006272396,0.008622862,0.0001898544,0.0002532145,0.003934733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009462979,0.00005052419,0.9910913,0.000003194406,0.00004351078,0.0001331473,0.0005292484,0.004604714,0.003050726,0.00009471399,0.0003797483,0.000009718599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998886,0.00004160391,0.00008678677,0.00002750709,0.000002474434,0.000002697686,0.0001944355,0.000006858295,0.0007515352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996325,0.00004187656,0.00003079934,0.000008855486,0.0000020521,0.000001772185,0.0001789232,0.000001888688,0.0001013855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02460727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04892808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0182288183359629,"score_gpt":0.2900949140003002,"score_spread":0.2718660956643373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}