{"id":"W1866637791","doi":"","title":"Modelling the vulnerability of buildings to wind — a review1This paper is one of a selection of papers in this Special Issue in honour of Professor Davenport.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Vulnerability (computing); Natural hazard; Selection (genetic algorithm); Architectural engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Vulnerability assessment; Operations research; Civil engineering; Construction engineering; Law; Geography; Political science; Meteorology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009595654,0.001675928,0.001791618,0.001842141,0.0003927724,0.001876365,0.001812066,0.001941557,0.001879897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001973218,0.0007534196,0.0008215448,0.003337121,0.000978612,0.004455367,0.0009307154,0.001422706,0.001054702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009012492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001069942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006412596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006044782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999576,0.0000686354,0.00004977993,0.0001040185,0.0001735083,0.00002805695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982464,0.001144894,0.0001166417,0.00005964463,0.0003778367,0.00005461931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006575045,0.0001600616,0.002369925,0.01392923,0.0003575489,0.0002865952,0.0004029396,0.08484644,0.002341927,0.04610106,0.0375956,0.811543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001727486,0.0003643144,0.003740647,0.00861626,0.0003505596,0.001129719,0.0005976827,0.03974936,0.002788179,0.04123683,0.9012206,0.0001886555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002048004,0.9823256,0.01130707,0.0009605349,0.0004558331,0.000007504873,0.00008192223,0.00003705325,0.002776449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01133431,0.9826828,0.003822762,0.000151274,0.0005797659,0.000007813643,0.0001373698,0.00002765871,0.001256194],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006412596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01275057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01580578910677526,"score_gpt":0.1982165184177148,"score_spread":0.1824107293109395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}