{"id":"W1867456545","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0402","title":"Comparisons of spatial patterns between windthrow and logging at two spatial scales","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Windthrow; Disturbance (geology); Context (archaeology); Spatial ecology; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Logging; Forest management; Range (aeronautics); Salvage logging; Geography; Forestry; Physical geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Forest ecology; Geology; Biology; Cartography; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002778208,0.0001227003,0.0001630738,0.001108538,0.0003237539,0.0004946204,0.00023267,0.0001596774,0.0008698297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001181595,0.00009458952,0.0001840332,0.001169513,0.0004797705,0.000268103,0.0004377661,0.0001404481,0.0000973045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007759868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000646001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2335676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5680943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996898,0.00003462679,0.0000217525,0.00009728527,0.00006184919,0.00009462904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987547,0.0003016239,0.0003842343,0.00006179299,0.0002645378,0.000233092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008249274,0.00001610327,0.9928724,0.00001505172,0.00004261193,0.00007287863,0.0008146914,0.00009785946,0.00182783,0.0000693864,0.00005829373,0.00403036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.369781e-7,0.000006111031,0.9995787,0.000001149927,0.000002579391,0.00001400356,0.0002846215,0.00004756193,0.00002148213,0.000005549393,0.00003682079,0.00000103832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992048,0.00007799421,0.0001040769,0.000006086486,0.000001070096,0.000004052039,0.0001570973,0.000002596036,0.0004421683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999406,0.00003064787,0.00009972807,0.000003001663,0.000001090772,0.000003849554,0.0002559018,0.000001253573,0.0001985716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2335676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4644161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04522757869339539,"score_gpt":0.3198098482971987,"score_spread":0.2745822696038033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}