{"id":"W1871169655","doi":"10.1139/t11-085","title":"Probabilistic version of the Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction evaluation: development and application","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Central University","keywords":"Liquefaction; Probabilistic logic; Penetration test; Soil liquefaction; Cone penetration test; Statistical model; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering; Probabilistic method; Probabilistic analysis of algorithms; Engineering; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006810482,0.00008190843,0.0001015695,0.00007242999,0.0001083755,0.00001143858,0.00009186057,0.0001308784,0.000009755436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001461088,0.00006684788,0.00002945578,0.00008848262,0.00002063054,0.000042638,0.00001405494,0.000220159,4.525553e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001877485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001206844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000507399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007331199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994126,0.00002114592,0.0002017793,0.00009512335,0.0001174788,0.0001519013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995318,0.00003989537,0.00003758435,0.0001143948,0.00008822816,0.0001881003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002760089,0.00002393999,0.0000280621,0.0002448602,0.00007080676,0.00000172207,0.0004855808,0.3090383,0.002720041,0.005532446,0.0005592015,0.6812674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002502435,0.00004375495,0.003086636,0.00006196443,0.00005088719,0.00008741461,0.00002846206,0.9754781,0.003668549,0.004110373,0.01300865,0.0001249836],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1626795,0.0004971953,0.8349465,0.0003255933,0.0003392264,0.0008789049,0.000008149632,0.00009426298,0.0002307116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868084,0.0000260998,0.01304861,0.00002400384,0.00002607814,0.00004378003,0.000001581819,0.00001359673,0.000007853863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8241289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2725977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01730753996058898,"score_gpt":0.2229406882973862,"score_spread":0.2056331483367972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}