{"id":"W1871744294","doi":"10.22230/jem.2006v7n3a353","title":"Assessing approaches to climate-change-related policy formulation in British Columbia's forest sector: The case of the mountain pine beetle epidemic","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Climate change; Punctuated equilibrium; Government (linguistics); Process (computing); Mountain pine beetle; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Business; Economics; Ecology; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02070394,0.0009300223,0.0007142159,0.003728355,0.0138349,0.01593568,0.003289773,0.00731631,0.005770045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04247339,0.0006137383,0.0007358231,0.005988644,0.006842578,0.005081802,0.005558927,0.005505634,0.0001913103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1234384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07976269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8773735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9234703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824614,0.01094142,0.0003865359,0.0004888882,0.00146888,0.004252871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768759,0.01667028,0.001182486,0.0004892146,0.002955746,0.001826353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001032943,0.00151599,0.08316816,0.001425509,0.0004778616,0.004786587,0.05073603,0.2371354,0.001759894,0.4377181,0.01499436,0.1652491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007411223,0.0008118441,0.1337721,0.001615189,0.000718102,0.0005346034,0.3504922,0.2348151,0.001717925,0.1867818,0.08748404,0.0005160927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7942046,0.003699081,0.006065393,0.03726151,0.00008912227,0.001068516,0.0002441651,0.00006926355,0.1572984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859763,0.001644041,0.006828628,0.001042347,0.00001484776,0.0002208744,0.00009199717,0.0000101271,0.004170819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1234384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8956125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03655223161296817,"score_gpt":0.2442595088519223,"score_spread":0.2077072772389541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}