{"id":"W1872703860","doi":"10.1002/wcc.261","title":"Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; Brandenburger Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Climate change; Greenhouse gas; Adaptation (eye); Climate change mitigation; Environmental resource management; Categorization; Context (archaeology); Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224472,0.0003420928,0.0004845563,0.0001464123,0.0001859015,0.00007848661,0.0002895118,0.0001238714,0.0003194973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004243861,0.00026438,0.0001100755,0.0005059665,0.00008762293,0.001223201,0.0007407119,0.0002402043,0.0002315499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001429978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001646955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004669605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976835,0.000137052,0.0008520521,0.0004359654,0.0002669435,0.0006244796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990222,0.0001123915,0.0003862524,0.0003714371,0.00002313452,0.00008461589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007750951,0.0003075394,0.08445904,0.004690692,0.00002413078,0.0000348442,0.3728348,0.0002555196,0.008807027,0.001839047,0.0004900843,0.5261797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002772738,0.001240769,0.4923755,0.0168473,0.000326789,0.0002437339,0.04250355,0.4305935,0.0007840496,0.002830313,0.006524343,0.002957437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836729,0.007727782,0.0001206689,0.002260972,0.000496691,0.004143709,0.00009127052,0.0001082874,0.001377748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296529,0.06755252,0.0004488669,0.0004293108,0.0001932655,0.001490564,0.0001868388,0.00004344872,0.00000234499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5232223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0606050479021664,"score_gpt":0.2757984200583548,"score_spread":0.2151933721561884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}