{"id":"W1872918746","doi":"10.14742/ajet.1192","title":"A multi-component model for assessing learning objects: The learning object evaluation metric (LOEM)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Interactivity; Metric (unit); Computer science; Learning object; Mathematics education; Sample (material); Component (thermodynamics); Reliability (semiconductor); Perception; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02192533,0.001471293,0.0010174,0.007478053,0.0008639136,0.004030957,0.00161141,0.001476409,0.001426913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06957853,0.0005055753,0.001702316,0.003381445,0.001879017,0.00433308,0.002978382,0.001218328,0.0007051149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002594731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002852532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002603004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002843567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9716603,0.0144252,0.002489511,0.001197076,0.009690473,0.0005374521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953862,0.02859816,0.003944941,0.002185391,0.010782,0.0006275279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000765179,0.001151722,0.1632636,0.003316978,0.0008638466,0.0002424727,0.006849355,0.03216218,0.01126352,0.04604771,0.008102289,0.7259713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004199024,0.008575404,0.3271632,0.003556651,0.001097033,0.00169445,0.00913174,0.490666,0.01578506,0.08567933,0.05532376,0.0009075083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1237524,0.001624107,0.8484877,0.001659914,0.0001149933,0.004869663,0.0006468878,0.001193011,0.01765134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4628149,0.0004572331,0.5292547,0.0002380895,0.00002557491,0.004697904,0.0006468532,0.00009528745,0.001769366],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1159536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07100787450322213,"score_gpt":0.3638243565181534,"score_spread":0.2928164820149313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}