{"id":"W1872969227","doi":"10.1002/9780470744307.gat162","title":"Ethical Issues in Toxic Chemical Hazard Evaluation, Risk Assessment and Precautionary Communications","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Precautionary principle; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Judgement; Framing (construction); Risk communication; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Risk management tools; Psychology; Business; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0473906,0.000748875,0.0005891032,0.002315703,0.00752712,0.01540869,0.00186681,0.01125719,0.01142233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05958448,0.0003345824,0.0005166831,0.002318474,0.03296352,0.007428179,0.007366401,0.008644782,0.001734686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007841623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006279676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00714449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9505389,0.03746357,0.001558024,0.001195818,0.008127335,0.00111628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9211456,0.06138774,0.003517276,0.003868074,0.007795785,0.00228561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001072535,0.00003044651,0.0002814522,0.0001048112,0.000005155548,0.000163833,0.003005934,0.0007089345,0.00008097928,0.9507139,0.02103629,0.02385745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007375559,0.00002047028,0.0003749136,0.0005355276,0.000005696119,0.0002537056,0.004183106,0.001001659,0.0004224664,0.7776668,0.2155056,0.00002264136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007606371,0.01545568,0.02929324,0.317057,0.00202434,0.0001938667,0.0000813075,0.00008102697,0.6282071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6041985,0.02628451,0.04430418,0.06842825,0.005135894,0.0007904088,0.0001157125,0.0002213681,0.2505211],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0473906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2506284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0524844940179943,"score_gpt":0.405593165859075,"score_spread":0.3531086718410807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}