{"id":"W1872969227","doi":"10.1002/9780470744307.gat162","title":"Ethical Issues in Toxic Chemical Hazard Evaluation, Risk Assessment and Precautionary Communications","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Precautionary principle; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Judgement; Framing (construction); Risk communication; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Risk management tools; Psychology; Business; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002286285,0.0002012653,0.0004425253,0.0002215195,0.0002806888,0.0001017839,0.0002825881,0.001012068,0.0004763654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004170503,0.0002002173,0.00003306575,0.0001429925,0.0005056898,0.00002466243,0.0001484234,0.0005566274,0.00003122227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000230571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001941892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001637542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005215656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973092,0.001194669,0.0003680297,0.0004458342,0.0003958684,0.0002864154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990992,0.00009171609,0.0002149214,0.000421002,0.00004597264,0.0001271774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009673161,0.000194787,0.0005100737,0.0000623168,0.00007631809,0.000001632292,0.003230914,0.00003374013,0.0005744345,0.3190091,0.6488987,0.02739829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005590136,0.00003441582,0.003347934,0.00004610345,0.00006575002,0.000001752338,0.001297576,0.001146434,0.000001113372,0.002942519,0.9903023,0.0002551117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006570604,0.007628371,0.0002135204,0.01347586,0.0005451824,0.003107388,0.00004059144,0.0002099896,0.9682085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.508229,0.1127523,0.009064198,0.003222883,0.002761282,0.002821176,0.0004905111,0.000250129,0.3604086],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6077999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8164625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0524844940179943,"score_gpt":0.405593165859075,"score_spread":0.3531086718410807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}