{"id":"W1874502797","doi":"10.1109/mwsym.1999.780291","title":"The frequency-domain TLM method with absorbing boundary conditions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectly matched layer; Boundary value problem; Boundary (topology); Reflection (computer programming); Range (aeronautics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Frequency domain; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Computational electromagnetics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Materials science; Electromagnetic field","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000595573,0.0005488456,0.0007134995,0.0006899777,0.0005302671,0.0008345434,0.0015186,0.001497611,0.007361483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001516284,0.0003304112,0.0006874183,0.0007788824,0.0005214265,0.001062057,0.00100481,0.001344637,0.003513945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004139438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001243345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001060118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996132,0.0001234068,0.00002087966,0.00003877482,0.0001824022,0.00002132321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994743,0.0001899953,0.00004799249,0.0001124028,0.0001533,0.00002191804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070204,0.00008200444,0.0004311634,0.0005819394,0.00006814303,0.0003313745,0.000347842,0.3599617,0.04560418,0.1764831,0.009625053,0.4063764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002321825,0.00003279704,0.00005986114,0.00003864528,0.00001301637,0.000193399,0.00002434632,0.9552203,0.006287818,0.00918163,0.0289026,0.00002234323],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007486919,0.00009896584,0.9960992,0.00004674267,0.00004938747,0.00003146089,0.00002485196,0.0002916339,0.002609043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04011785,0.0002745365,0.9505317,0.0001057098,0.00004544939,0.0002306742,0.0001396337,0.0002477989,0.00830671],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007361483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02462655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009402478688703888,"score_gpt":0.2753299818258089,"score_spread":0.2659275031371051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}