{"id":"W1878144120","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1502280112","title":"The incidence and role of negative citations in science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quality (philosophy); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Point (geometry); Data science; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Library science; Mathematics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04774466,0.0000597417,0.0001450244,0.009888072,0.0003886878,0.0003482662,0.003845705,0.00004011564,0.000003292623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1258008,0.00002884901,0.00003762581,0.1120391,0.00610601,0.001434967,0.000887394,0.0001586228,0.000001383152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005937406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003418047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000484806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001162825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870121,0.00002351636,0.0005812701,0.0003299387,0.01182163,0.0002314822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881191,0.004537235,0.0007729218,0.00002552674,0.006415385,0.0001298566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776909,0.0000760566,0.4907479,0.000007761886,0.000004460639,6.859259e-9,0.002293452,0.0002332688,0.1435755,0.3469014,0.000834408,0.01529801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009996649,0.00004394784,0.4630331,0.00001528818,8.604987e-7,0.000001697161,0.003428785,0.005907184,0.06324305,0.4640936,0.000100708,0.00003183538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846978,0.0004595276,0.000001721603,0.003055482,0.00002338296,0.0001490418,0.000007031416,0.000001726284,0.01160424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985734,0.00006168572,0.001212995,0.00004082778,0.00001184412,0.00000486025,5.120738e-9,0.000001093583,0.00009332771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1171921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.485203514959724,"score_gpt":0.5552463451501192,"score_spread":0.07004283019039514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}