{"id":"W1878224881","doi":"10.1109/iecon.1993.339327","title":"A symbolic approach to determining exciting trajectories for identification of manipulator dynamic models","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rendering (computer graphics); Computer science; Trajectory; Inertial frame of reference; Computation; Identification (biology); Algorithm; Parameter space; Set (abstract data type); Estimation theory; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005475883,0.0005810709,0.0003982501,0.0004871954,0.0005392039,0.0007407431,0.0005842873,0.0005210623,0.004132398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003361684,0.0002920637,0.0003530794,0.0004061228,0.001152198,0.001048339,0.0008137333,0.001084148,0.0005920756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003667682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008106723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009308286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001100351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997299,0.00008453985,0.00001803667,0.00004133248,0.00010615,0.00001998967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990734,0.0005810744,0.00009566893,0.0001260396,0.00009978886,0.00002407665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001102703,0.00005480843,0.0006318163,0.0001857145,0.00002426582,0.0001890935,0.0003474299,0.4769726,0.02790524,0.2856342,0.0009575402,0.2069871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001042746,0.00005440715,0.00009459609,0.00001956727,0.000006416714,0.00007778079,0.00003200252,0.9428089,0.007289242,0.04623545,0.003358151,0.00001313889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002330689,0.00001229489,0.9967983,0.00001673005,0.000003712483,0.00000848056,0.00001050028,0.0001073668,0.0007119724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1610647,0.0001087308,0.8366576,0.00002499207,0.00001466979,0.0001096097,0.00009522798,0.0001296916,0.001794709],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004132398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01382422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03533759608901189,"score_gpt":0.2215518072307066,"score_spread":0.1862142111416947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}