{"id":"W1878438687","doi":"10.1002/rcm.7181","title":"Quantifying non‐covalent binding affinity using mass spectrometry: A systematic study on complexes of cyclodextrins with alkali metal cations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","topic":"Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Electrospray ionization; Alkali metal; Mass spectrometry; Stability constants of complexes; Competitive binding; Titration; Equilibrium constant; Covalent bond; Ionization; Affinities; Binding constant; Metal; Cyclodextrin; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Inorganic chemistry; Physical chemistry; Ion; Stereochemistry; Chromatography; Binding site; Aqueous solution; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129645,0.000822703,0.0006325587,0.0007448973,0.0003240087,0.0005843956,0.0005769547,0.0006504451,0.0004048916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001191515,0.000359013,0.0003730317,0.0005532433,0.0007377909,0.0007062319,0.0005797349,0.0006105871,0.0003324404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005345086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003444057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006880445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000818731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989464,0.0001937906,0.00006504173,0.0002967668,0.0004331877,0.00006482888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993882,0.0001930982,0.0001446731,0.00007342991,0.0001567249,0.00004385353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003066797,0.00002842809,0.001042824,0.0002970856,0.00002345326,0.0000337916,0.00004399529,0.0002581068,0.9910656,0.0001562824,0.00004176368,0.006977879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003290042,0.0001677582,0.003035536,0.00002234578,0.00003514828,0.0002298172,0.00004468771,0.00298591,0.9904641,0.0001208055,0.002872026,0.00001849748],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8421463,0.02180389,0.1312376,0.0004106844,0.00007233657,0.00059931,0.000424321,0.0003490075,0.00295644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073384,0.01311802,0.07571616,0.0005318954,0.00004873994,0.0003224964,0.0003160769,0.00005944616,0.00254866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001129645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005974174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1275032683574134,"score_gpt":0.3556672322965628,"score_spread":0.2281639639391495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}