{"id":"W1878480619","doi":"10.1139/l2012-086","title":"Discussion of “Nonlinear behaviour of steel–concrete composite bridges: finite element modelling and experimental verification”<sup>1</sup>Appears in the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, <b>39</b>: 191–202 [doi:10.1139/l11-124].","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Load-Bearing Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Structural engineering; Nonlinear system; Composite number; Engineering; Civil engineering; Materials science; Composite material; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008742088,0.0003683733,0.0006816753,0.001280519,0.00009950023,0.00009547544,0.0005329827,0.0001595013,0.0001491605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001136304,0.0003049017,0.0002283736,0.0005324266,0.00007981995,0.0004592017,0.00002119197,0.0007205671,0.000001416814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005417116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004014321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01212266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04292412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997375,0.00005207235,0.00125201,0.0001537131,0.0004703682,0.0006968461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980943,0.0001149019,0.0003621483,0.0003173738,0.0002112864,0.000900011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008041978,0.000007085602,0.007595381,0.0001131183,0.0001629242,0.00004758997,0.005272235,0.9738554,0.01273409,0.00004819457,0.0000972359,0.00005869265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001205585,0.0002113053,0.01698092,0.001163565,0.0003168057,0.0004423579,0.002417753,0.9505863,0.02340376,0.000005836072,0.002609345,0.0006564792],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901356,0.005465907,0.003540834,0.00008143167,0.0003911595,0.0001652316,0.00008384581,0.00001385511,0.0001222104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997528,0.00006404673,0.002032511,0.000008492557,0.0002591429,0.00000376061,0.00001338512,0.00007300879,0.00001772258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03080146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01138407933245162,"score_gpt":0.2014904795052388,"score_spread":0.1901064001727872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}