{"id":"W1879098942","doi":"10.1002/jat.2949","title":"New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Concordance; Scope (computer science); Action (physics); Construct (python library); Chemical safety; Relevance (law); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Mode of action; Computer science; Adverse Outcome Pathway; In silico; Data science; Management science; Computational biology; Medicine; Biology; Bioinformatics; Toxicology; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2953713,0.002591811,0.003860271,0.01403829,0.002795046,0.01709958,0.0124758,0.007428021,0.004045625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2701584,0.001698304,0.005041265,0.01211145,0.02921265,0.01322176,0.01186943,0.02127353,0.001289928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01498424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04048261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02618027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01792907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7383709,0.1588924,0.02404672,0.01218533,0.06383599,0.00266862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5886065,0.2639115,0.01786288,0.03867571,0.08600734,0.004935994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005735266,0.0001059943,0.001668125,0.002702309,0.0001791817,0.0002343581,0.004093021,0.004312388,0.0005910925,0.76695,0.02368461,0.1954216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003177938,0.0001761242,0.002258402,0.007512888,0.0001612927,0.0004968554,0.001698062,0.00582037,0.0009593454,0.5854709,0.3951793,0.000234686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002785956,0.04347562,0.7837276,0.1168822,0.005590726,0.001108078,0.0008762648,0.0008290369,0.04472459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0400614,0.02016685,0.9156538,0.01473816,0.002938107,0.001363699,0.0008213681,0.0005645175,0.003692128],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2953713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8689327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02307593314716271,"score_gpt":0.3005302266992993,"score_spread":0.2774542935521366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}