{"id":"W1881470845","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1477","title":"Using sparse dose–response data for wildlife risk assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"Transport Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Computer science; Risk assessment; Set (abstract data type); Hazard; Range (aeronautics); Point estimation; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07345606,0.002221862,0.002986433,0.006968391,0.0008504416,0.003898017,0.003118782,0.003221121,0.01126867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1844502,0.001489054,0.005253115,0.008545006,0.001552862,0.005075022,0.003473612,0.004176915,0.002803147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002521554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00232411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006387831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007687742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9323809,0.04846505,0.004574083,0.005511,0.008625789,0.0004432383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7753944,0.1658747,0.01999404,0.02707092,0.01100554,0.0006603457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003219597,0.001543712,0.1030226,0.01878315,0.007893909,0.0009325457,0.001493961,0.3015155,0.01749307,0.04598675,0.03406991,0.4640453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009440913,0.004865903,0.07822541,0.006953572,0.004393712,0.002348628,0.001403483,0.389582,0.02380247,0.2762274,0.2104228,0.0008306822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05111025,0.007062019,0.8785361,0.002115858,0.0004729167,0.003676683,0.04019314,0.003325757,0.01350728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3603035,0.005313231,0.5919514,0.003147937,0.0002290859,0.006726284,0.02711483,0.001177893,0.004035836],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07345606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3884774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08994334285048636,"score_gpt":0.3620862177011249,"score_spread":0.2721428748506386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}