{"id":"W1881621876","doi":"10.1149/ma2014-04/4/746","title":"Failure Mode Analysis of Li-Ion Batteries Using In Situ Scanning Electron Microscopy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ECS Meeting Abstracts","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Scanning electron microscope; Materials science; Battery (electricity); Plating (geology); Cathode; Electrochemistry; Lithium (medication); Lithium-ion battery; In situ; Particle (ecology); Analytical Chemistry (journal); Ion; Electrode; Composite material; Electrical engineering; Chemistry; Power (physics); Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002046249,0.0003754474,0.0002634427,0.001036849,0.0002155892,0.0002472937,0.0004199745,0.0003962373,0.003044193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000286937,0.0001584323,0.00016094,0.0003621869,0.0001540722,0.0002635618,0.0001549256,0.0001897393,0.0003854281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001852337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005037095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000701658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001098988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999903,0.000006213901,0.000007001137,0.00001831355,0.0000512338,0.00001423866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999653,0.0000903391,0.00004911371,0.00004437168,0.0001443425,0.00001892114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001323587,0.00006689391,0.01093931,0.0002212403,0.0000204578,0.000666899,0.0004118137,0.002312899,0.9649092,0.0002633941,0.0004440605,0.01961142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009538787,0.0007393723,0.164713,0.00005760772,0.00006514874,0.001953057,0.0007828798,0.0581873,0.7675528,0.0005208483,0.005371984,0.00004654576],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971723,0.0008580926,0.02258034,0.00004461405,0.00002801323,0.00005911123,0.001048621,0.0007001741,0.002957929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905903,0.0003060535,0.006279801,0.00002191031,0.000009492299,0.00004798726,0.00043157,0.00003940089,0.002273497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003044193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01018381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01082283259007635,"score_gpt":0.2959369945653517,"score_spread":0.2851141619752754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}