{"id":"W18817274","doi":"10.1016/b978-012505290-0/50005-3","title":"Phenology, Growth, and Allocation in Global Terrestrial Productivity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phenology; Productivity; Primary production; Ecosystem; Terrestrial ecosystem; Canopy; Global change; Ecology; Carbon cycle; Production (economics); Terrestrial plant; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001749537,0.0004827048,0.0003518729,0.0003944786,0.0001706372,0.0009660563,0.000346804,0.0005422516,0.007597492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003745809,0.0002366337,0.0001458172,0.00125098,0.0005352474,0.001160503,0.0002276323,0.0006152469,0.001013558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006669273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005090054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008067122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0165171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999634,0.000006726596,0.000001981232,0.00001177561,0.00001197182,0.000004172673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998885,0.00007944589,0.00000918368,0.000004983376,0.000009255718,0.000008574413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009406835,0.00009320094,0.009724368,0.000584498,0.00005369682,0.0002227117,0.0005650459,0.01069373,0.004805222,0.112634,0.05752051,0.8030089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002693731,0.00008783166,0.07320634,0.0005168029,0.00008702497,0.0007133411,0.0005654154,0.007951303,0.0007702684,0.353873,0.5621623,0.00003923702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06532542,0.6584409,0.02672054,0.008499593,0.0008867834,0.00003269134,0.001605816,0.0003959652,0.2380923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3404331,0.373291,0.01731058,0.001280912,0.002252853,0.00009745704,0.001302871,0.0001653999,0.2638657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008067122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0254162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00936775550022843,"score_gpt":0.2074333093914054,"score_spread":0.198065553891177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}