{"id":"W1882133131","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00416.x","title":"Managing fisheries well: delivering the promises of an ecosystem approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Stock (firearms); Incentive; Corporate governance; Fisheries management; Business; Sustainability; Stewardship (theology); Environmental resource management; Flexibility (engineering); Fishery; Fish stock; Ecosystem; Environmental planning; Economics; Ecology; Engineering; Environmental science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002757125,0.000163379,0.0001993918,0.00002445895,0.0002646363,0.00009226574,0.0004034946,0.00006340761,0.004655079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000259188,0.0001167407,0.00004511418,0.0001721329,0.0004764459,0.0006721371,0.0004626121,0.0001487412,0.00001012615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001869437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007937455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001836599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001164463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988083,0.00007930868,0.0002335875,0.0003107361,0.0002517943,0.0003163131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993949,0.00003018394,0.00007765968,0.0003767867,0.00001439388,0.0001060764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003058343,0.0002213765,0.8670684,0.0003552488,0.00007244439,0.00002882318,0.01307649,0.000009318641,0.0002230939,0.0003207875,0.0085602,0.109758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008085859,0.0008130828,0.5227466,0.00003026033,0.0000610327,0.0001034197,0.01256105,0.006236743,0.002872041,0.001951502,0.4509753,0.0008404029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4835513,0.000008367007,0.0001081941,0.0001972578,0.00003986607,0.0002201517,0.00001016585,0.00003907644,0.5158256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948446,0.0001417164,0.002265017,0.0002289688,0.00004824285,0.00007491676,0.00001386577,0.00002735948,0.002355269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5134704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02687641200113179,"score_gpt":0.1991852972879758,"score_spread":0.172308885286844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}