{"id":"W1882216188","doi":"10.3968/j.sss.1923018420110202.5z920","title":"An Analysis of Procedure in Selection of Representatives from Hearings: Take the Price Hearing in Z city as Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Focus group; Public relations; Political science; Universality (dynamical systems); Qualitative research; Selection (genetic algorithm); Qualitative analysis; Public participation; Public administration; Psychology; Business; Sociology; Law; Marketing; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004116239,0.00004609405,0.0002421278,0.0003800919,0.0002335974,0.000003338688,0.0003450946,0.00005369682,0.00003076764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003191478,0.00003609444,0.00002935727,0.002699812,0.02364414,0.0002682977,0.00009470955,0.0001583416,1.252999e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008795124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004849124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05932315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05782879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985829,0.0004026961,0.0002993465,0.0002304189,0.000252703,0.000231909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990162,0.000494049,0.0001655208,0.000111759,0.000182032,0.00003049842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001463494,0.00007744419,0.5141709,0.000005107482,0.00002661093,0.000003881545,0.4781988,0.00004552522,0.0007921231,0.006611257,0.000001806816,0.0000519648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006693837,0.00005359448,0.5715505,0.000009262957,0.000005858876,6.097732e-7,0.4230386,0.0002245067,0.0009579507,0.004065674,0.000001485363,0.00002501864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957114,0.00008920174,0.000004051911,0.0005103741,0.00002638748,0.0001315921,0.000003897431,0.000003361675,0.003519718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999649,0.0001004668,0.0001791973,0.00002675571,0.000009728756,0.00001398393,2.485849e-7,8.764096e-7,0.00001969721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05737964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2613062547636357,"score_gpt":0.5266634707051355,"score_spread":0.2653572159414998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}