{"id":"W1882367679","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.1.26","title":"Further validation of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA-DK): Rasch analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","topic":"Dysphagia Assessment and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Differential item functioning; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Danish; Construct (python library); Construct validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Polytomous Rasch model; Psychometrics; Item response theory; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706014,0.0000808357,0.0002006844,0.0001775163,0.0001545944,0.000006357609,0.0003176542,0.00005994539,0.0001075438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003174772,0.00004384061,0.0002257782,0.0002486817,0.00009705206,0.0001888986,0.00008856209,0.0002016875,7.681744e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001278215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006351002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005038513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001649831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997763,0.0008080662,0.0006283756,0.00009769537,0.0006226768,0.00008012645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966707,0.00107079,0.0012278,0.0001645562,0.0008418863,0.00002423048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005451087,0.0007417016,0.918123,0.0001095975,0.003217959,2.811256e-7,0.01085144,0.005149738,0.0118352,0.01399491,0.002349442,0.03308164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001584803,0.0002703553,0.9799581,0.000232196,0.0002285743,4.626837e-7,0.002160591,0.0005375891,0.001246103,0.004220897,0.009502221,0.00005814743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871409,0.00002988426,0.001426535,0.008672052,0.001351987,0.000336917,0.00002045063,0.000003383935,0.001017876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979767,0.0001138512,0.001245168,0.0002716093,0.00008959363,0.000007044416,0.000003996603,0.000006186511,0.0002858535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06183508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1787768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01381091244969538,"score_gpt":0.3779472839356417,"score_spread":0.3641363714859463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}