{"id":"W1883379657","doi":"","title":"Constitutions as \"Living Trees\"? Comparative Constitutional Law and Interpretive Metaphors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Comparative law; Supreme court; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Constitutional law; Adjudication; Public law; International law; Municipal law; Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003256037,0.0003526649,0.0004666653,0.0003885482,0.003483557,0.00127737,0.0007482088,0.0001669684,0.0007287518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000514043,0.0003879317,0.0002021762,0.001073024,0.006252836,0.004941837,0.0009542483,0.0003303434,0.001779028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008427752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005711739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004884439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01723066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974933,0.0002221924,0.0003155039,0.0006797208,0.0006750074,0.0006142301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980756,0.0006092674,0.0001550068,0.0001892508,0.0005233467,0.000447533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146689,0.0001278418,0.05408273,0.000004216824,0.0001509127,0.00008072118,0.0009990885,0.00008207683,0.00006997705,0.943367,0.0008063363,0.0001144282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000395453,0.00006934826,0.03811826,0.0002245632,0.0001318733,0.00001806402,0.002844406,0.000003619112,0.0001705643,0.01488897,0.9424772,0.0006577093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2814835,0.00004732254,0.0008286466,0.000422464,0.0002797463,0.0004840526,0.0005182109,0.0001914606,0.7157446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959263,0.00004512458,0.00009596504,0.0007286165,0.0001683358,0.000009411877,0.00004890189,0.000008598251,0.002968713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03571265365967889,"score_gpt":0.2901464939763798,"score_spread":0.2544338403167009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}