{"id":"W1883554158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421","title":"LOOKING FOR QUALITY: THE EMPIRICAL DEBATE IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; CONTEST; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005015777,0.0001168152,0.0002160466,0.0005243783,0.0007473363,0.001381671,0.001687823,0.0001191139,0.0007830605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687089,0.00009866351,0.00004873297,0.00282987,0.0002004914,0.00209698,0.0003467244,0.0005197135,0.0002607381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001924627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001052944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01917818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00605962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970404,0.0006638727,0.0005268207,0.0003499576,0.0008348802,0.0005840749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924569,0.005346541,0.0001623159,0.0004103524,0.001398584,0.0002253591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003924367,0.0008349626,0.01822215,0.0006440767,0.0001100899,0.000003676481,0.1931829,0.001301939,0.00171816,0.1427788,0.6069073,0.03390357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091516,0.00008937766,0.1642025,0.000148909,0.0001945102,5.084471e-7,0.04869923,0.0002707589,0.0003999947,0.003676884,0.7815534,0.0003547083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4596044,0.0000484972,0.0009991059,0.3992827,0.001307,0.003307822,0.00001965488,0.00005936813,0.1353715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761761,0.00001916276,0.001124126,0.01708362,0.0008994228,0.0006673503,0.000004847396,0.0000258439,0.003999496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5165718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5530687811844535,"score_gpt":0.6007818828052836,"score_spread":0.04771310162083009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}