{"id":"W1883916697","doi":"10.1002/cjas.201","title":"The Use of Governance Indexes in the Governance‐Performance Relationship Literature: International Evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Endogeneity; Empirical evidence; Relation (database); Economics; Empirical research; Business; Public economics; Accounting; Positive economics; Political science; Econometrics; Computer science; Management; Data mining; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03525814,0.0005390612,0.001000847,0.00660273,0.0007019186,0.007492543,0.001094565,0.0008566611,0.003977131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1028295,0.0002932439,0.0004692504,0.01732693,0.004386943,0.003856558,0.002497815,0.001687839,0.0005711091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001642759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001995538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005622273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005553158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9807423,0.01032224,0.002279868,0.001925431,0.004198036,0.0005321735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6068189,0.2771504,0.06356417,0.01563043,0.03476086,0.002075207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000403701,0.0001877836,0.5609882,0.004560188,0.001097816,0.0002368073,0.002762844,0.001098362,0.0004045201,0.03015815,0.005351723,0.3927497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005675944,0.000527029,0.875576,0.01471589,0.001588619,0.0006530508,0.009925246,0.002696797,0.001723646,0.01602326,0.07638317,0.0001304427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5328157,0.343582,0.01141656,0.01645578,0.001037644,0.0001473888,0.001300679,0.00006686326,0.09317724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562269,0.03980534,0.001890954,0.0006101747,0.0005211295,0.00002277515,0.000418592,0.00002660725,0.0004773689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03525814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1864651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2207144161941489,"score_gpt":0.2938766457248092,"score_spread":0.07316222953066029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}