{"id":"W1884338217","doi":"10.1111/bor.12087","title":"Evaluating the persistence of post‐fire residual patches in the eastern<scp>C</scp>anadian boreal mixedwood forest","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boreas","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Taiga; Environmental science; Fire regime; Residual; Ecology; Persistence (discontinuity); Ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Physical geography; Forestry; Geography; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002471182,0.0001874173,0.000200138,0.00003065405,0.0001801558,0.00005785775,0.0008850503,0.00008345765,0.00002451599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001277868,0.0001119191,0.00008733905,0.0002876671,0.0002646216,0.0001590475,0.0001447631,0.0001993419,0.0001376871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009413915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003460552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04750011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06076521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975394,0.000676516,0.0003188072,0.0003373989,0.0006992504,0.0004286255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978504,0.001172304,0.0001844911,0.0006845237,0.00001871875,0.00008960573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001659182,0.000108106,0.9511189,0.00005142558,0.00001875942,0.00001176754,0.01076047,0.0006357024,0.001089494,0.0003456428,0.002449223,0.03339394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000314687,0.0004276147,0.9483134,0.00006897063,0.00002515339,0.0000238883,0.002977701,0.04596964,0.0001934456,0.0002754614,0.00133205,0.00007800633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808146,0.0000838952,0.00000894461,0.0009058199,0.00008889541,0.0005030346,0.00002173942,0.00001832226,0.01755471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991413,0.00000254699,0.0001564432,0.0003344589,0.00009581249,0.00005392884,0.00001605908,0.0000205078,0.0001789601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04533393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9588427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02436341394179227,"score_gpt":0.2481432965209658,"score_spread":0.2237798825791736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}