{"id":"W1884338217","doi":"10.1111/bor.12087","title":"Evaluating the persistence of post‐fire residual patches in the eastern<scp>C</scp>anadian boreal mixedwood forest","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boreas","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Taiga; Environmental science; Fire regime; Residual; Ecology; Persistence (discontinuity); Ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Physical geography; Forestry; Geography; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004841383,0.0002854028,0.0001974765,0.000868048,0.0004073249,0.0006659698,0.0003079312,0.0002998555,0.0003139946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006373801,0.0001646402,0.0002299461,0.0004033688,0.0004023956,0.0004158048,0.0002990612,0.0002051311,0.00008270621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002880929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001668899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01194324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03660198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998162,0.00002050983,0.0000165366,0.00007101538,0.00002791868,0.00004776818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.0001601505,0.0003811042,0.00006397929,0.0001078227,0.000182095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002960807,0.00007820491,0.9788527,0.00003262958,0.00006161393,0.0001270295,0.0002730265,0.0002414923,0.01520111,0.00002087041,0.00002408592,0.004791262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001189597,0.00005004173,0.9993304,0.000001311363,0.000008393063,0.00006359778,0.00009159225,0.0001945704,0.0002217373,0.000003954354,0.00003154904,0.000001664922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997908,0.0000485778,0.00004343462,0.000001008442,5.784887e-7,0.000001836332,0.00003580242,0.000001349041,0.00007655097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997099,0.00001992422,0.0001167681,0.000001861524,0.00000120852,0.000001794935,0.0001176245,8.077009e-7,0.00002997845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02374738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02436341394179227,"score_gpt":0.2481432965209658,"score_spread":0.2237798825791736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}