{"id":"W1885882554","doi":"10.1111/ele.12495","title":"Emergence of nutrient co‐limitation through movement in stoichiometric meta‐ecosystems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Nutrient; Autotroph; Ecosystem; Herbivore; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Nutrient cycle; Limiting; Primary producers; Environmental science; Ecological stoichiometry; Productivity; Biology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000843417,0.0003926848,0.0008879094,0.0004252618,0.00006758448,0.00001567295,0.0007338039,0.0005227445,0.001623616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007496257,0.0003435091,0.0002341626,0.001075246,0.0002366769,0.0001836868,0.0002091874,0.0007678439,0.0005300459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005363311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003737189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001179493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002255982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964908,0.0003938568,0.0009343531,0.0007639634,0.0007767978,0.0006402615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983893,0.0002424706,0.000730485,0.0005497345,0.00002566225,0.0000623175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005339185,0.00009598985,0.03324151,0.0001273321,0.0002640522,0.0001636145,0.0003418444,0.003311485,0.0009175677,0.00002096402,0.9614885,0.00002178662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003391793,0.001200604,0.05778597,0.000235563,0.001906948,0.00006930433,0.0008946424,0.01281853,0.0009782139,0.002450153,0.9149935,0.003274833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.5675522,0.0007849889,0.001475582,0.4120136,0.003729678,0.003094763,0.0002669893,0.00007561212,0.01100652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.428723,0.0003036666,0.001547181,0.5660757,0.0005548078,0.0006029845,0.0005627312,0.0001191238,0.001510736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1540621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02654068626758881,"score_gpt":0.2523280583430931,"score_spread":0.2257873720755043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}