{"id":"W1887964547","doi":"10.1002/jat.2984","title":"Mode of action human relevance (species concordance) framework: Evolution of the Bradford Hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","topic":"Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":201,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Concordance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Biology; Computer science; Bioinformatics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5095779,0.002198074,0.006401983,0.03298082,0.005705459,0.02145147,0.01111369,0.01129608,0.00513435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6197554,0.002817484,0.007292073,0.01026007,0.03558059,0.01788997,0.01146541,0.01740116,0.0008249156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02075407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02892483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007012858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007334955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3799257,0.4898846,0.04756164,0.01915743,0.06113734,0.002333289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1994524,0.6978924,0.0306161,0.02224155,0.04697847,0.002819054],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003964303,0.0000725247,0.002105079,0.01006258,0.001747247,0.0004847966,0.00556049,0.002743914,0.0006653435,0.8610108,0.01183714,0.1033136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002956688,0.0005419682,0.00282789,0.01680281,0.001504113,0.0007575981,0.002038018,0.005360447,0.001263637,0.8718966,0.09643229,0.0002789986],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009686084,0.05908853,0.7054564,0.1424604,0.005574937,0.005189064,0.001327822,0.0003140501,0.07090278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2009156,0.008867813,0.7416887,0.03497729,0.003650641,0.007364015,0.000275173,0.0001458529,0.002114842],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5095779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6047778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1704304831484834,"score_gpt":0.380201066179581,"score_spread":0.2097705830310976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}