{"id":"W1887964547","doi":"10.1002/jat.2984","title":"Mode of action human relevance (species concordance) framework: Evolution of the Bradford Hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","topic":"Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":201,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Concordance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Biology; Computer science; Bioinformatics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006493668,0.000183519,0.002620605,0.0001277588,0.0000994067,0.000006669276,0.0002832013,0.0002807032,0.0001194233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003257011,0.00006325157,0.0007042623,0.0007977386,0.0005137874,0.00006742164,0.00007150655,0.0003511941,1.612722e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007262508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008862762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006368871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009619836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972959,0.0004042012,0.001686007,0.000182171,0.0003047222,0.0001270589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912045,0.003230641,0.004985268,0.0001266018,0.0004060578,0.00004692783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004849623,0.001117259,0.005531138,0.005960661,0.01297174,0.000003411642,0.0009308046,0.006405891,0.3489349,0.3878933,0.0007767185,0.2289893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001779047,0.007906734,0.4038938,0.03767681,0.1024292,0.0002038504,0.003162944,0.003054528,0.03821677,0.119119,0.2800286,0.002528692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2529188,0.7442489,0.0008107378,0.0003393027,0.000164594,0.0006232996,0.0001722444,0.000004896477,0.0007173117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6226167,0.3771112,0.0001835191,0.000009455383,0.00006022273,0.000003059557,0.00000426758,6.143728e-7,0.00001098307],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3983627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2579324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1704304831484834,"score_gpt":0.380201066179581,"score_spread":0.2097705830310976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}