{"id":"W1891068172","doi":"10.2310/8000.2014.141406","title":"The TACTIC: development and validation of the Tool for Assessing Chest Tube Insertion Competency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Medical Protective Association; Alberta Children's Hospital; Vancouver General Hospital; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Inter-rater reliability; Medicine; Construct validity; Chest tube; Reliability (semiconductor); Physical therapy; Content validity; Medical physics; Emergency medicine; Surgery; Psychometrics; Patient satisfaction; Psychology; Pneumothorax; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02489223,0.0009773197,0.00085576,0.002607217,0.0008064601,0.0024994,0.001773641,0.001499651,0.003204665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06884403,0.0007294773,0.001652936,0.0009262476,0.001146289,0.002346409,0.003206651,0.001838233,0.002093673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001246773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007054928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002691512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005409747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868633,0.004802338,0.002372034,0.0007936757,0.004778771,0.0003899594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942206,0.02805396,0.003901845,0.003565597,0.0205413,0.001731358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002611555,0.003369848,0.2468724,0.00192978,0.0004381035,0.0006332106,0.006232896,0.005141313,0.01801713,0.004393015,0.03061947,0.6797414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002592303,0.01175408,0.672899,0.003942318,0.001533846,0.00895731,0.005787876,0.0876454,0.07108263,0.008400775,0.1244778,0.0009267527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7458984,0.001426168,0.1966771,0.002726084,0.00121018,0.02454876,0.005142589,0.004625728,0.01774502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5269129,0.001162859,0.442331,0.0009286923,0.0002028662,0.01753245,0.004101328,0.0009209938,0.005906864],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02489223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1316442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1968336978920766,"score_gpt":0.412223577802731,"score_spread":0.2153898799106544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}