{"id":"W1891139691","doi":"","title":"Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Blinding; Journal club; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Internal medicine; Medical education; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6782509,0.003053192,0.006861298,0.0479873,0.006379177,0.01556448,0.005637427,0.006061045,0.002444546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9282308,0.003945825,0.005673737,0.03942038,0.007588332,0.005938338,0.00879677,0.003894845,0.001369457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01453527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04679533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004183191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005619056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1068453,0.3779308,0.4093186,0.01294375,0.09094375,0.002017853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02250545,0.3755665,0.216561,0.04108234,0.3376511,0.006633542],"domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":"reporting","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006310183,0.0003997606,0.1414163,0.1796473,0.01366943,0.001242583,0.04496052,0.001061585,0.004279251,0.00353394,0.2140364,0.3894427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005767703,0.004528294,0.2901028,0.2071629,0.02572114,0.004771283,0.01884307,0.01005786,0.008766872,0.01483746,0.4069494,0.002491204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1437032,0.3333735,0.1169841,0.1330804,0.1110191,0.1087798,0.02961664,0.004933998,0.01850921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6093706,0.04800932,0.2199043,0.01754662,0.01501712,0.0760813,0.009088378,0.001478691,0.003503645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3217491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3967739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9101211366223355,"score_gpt":0.5674883961672319,"score_spread":0.3426327404551036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}